| Comparative
Price Quote and Reporting System Overview The existing sales
and inventory management systems were enhanced to provide a proactive comparative price reporting system (CPRS)
in order to reduce supplier claims.
Comparative price quote data can now be entered into the system and
analyzed. The company can use the new
pricing data for its competitive value and track the information for planning
purposes. The company was
provided with several new reports available to users on an ad hoc basis. The easy access to comparative pricing data
has enhanced the company’s ability to analyze regional sales performance and
improve price and revenue forecasting as well as simplify the liquidation process. Business
Benefits
· Streamline the
process for the tracking and reporting of comparative prices. ·
Improve
the accuracy and timeliness of comparative and sales price reporting. · Use comparative
prices to improve the companies average retail price (ARP). · Provide accurate
and timely Price Analysis using comparative prices and average retail
price. · Compile comparative
prices, purchase and other price data by product and ship date. · Provide timely
ad-hoc reports for claims, producers, forecasting, liquidation and sales. · Better analyze the
performance of the company sales. · Improve the company’s ability to forecast
sales prices and revenues · Reduce supplier
claims by tracking comparative prices and providing proactive reports. Architecture
Process
Flow Diagram
Methodology
and Approach The
Artech project methodology consists of six areas – MIS Strategy, Foundation,
Conceptual Design, Detail Design, Build, and Rollout. Based on the client/project needs the methodology is customized
to both maintain Artech’s standard of excellence and meet the specific
requirements of the particular project. This
project included the following steps: Foundation
/Conceptual Design- 3 weeks
·
Facilitated
cross functional group meetings to discuss needs. ·
Built
issues and assumptions lists. ·
Built
the business case and business benefits list. ·
Built
consensus among the users and management about what needed to be done. ·
Reconfirmed
requirements with Client. ·
Published
the Conceptual Design document. Detail
Design - 2 weeks ·
Detailed
specific data attributes and entities. ·
Finalized
data model. ·
Prepared
detail screen designs and finalized design with user. ·
Worked
with the user to finalize report specifications and ad-hoc query needs. Build - 4
weeks ·
Created
the tables, procedures, functions, etc. necessary. ·
Created
the user interfaces. ·
Built
the necessary reports. ·
Set
up security requirements. ·
Tested
usability, functionality, and accuracy. ·
Created
testing scripts to be delivered with the project to the client. Rollout -
1 week
·
Established
guidelines and business rules for comparative price mapping. ·
Trained
business users and client technical staff. · Supported the rollout of the new functionality and enhancements |
|||||||||||||